4.5 Article

Early outcomes of using custom-made augments in revision total hip arthroplasty

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 46, Issue 10, Pages 2229-2235

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05489-9

Keywords

Hip joint; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Custom-made acetabular augments; Uncontained loss of bone stock

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty using custom-made augments (CMA), showing promising results with low dislocation rate.
Introduction The continuing high demand for revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) requires not only additional economic costs, but also the search for new, effective methods to manage the reconstruction of acetabular bone loss. This study focuses on the assessment of the clinical and radiographic outcomes after RTHA using custom-made augments (CMA) in the short-term follow-up period. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the results of using CMAs in 19 patients (20 hips). The average follow-up period was 41.3 months. All surgery was performed on defect types III and IV as per the Gross and Saleh classification. Results There was a statistically significant difference when comparing the Oxford Hip Score before RTHA of 15.0 (Std. deviation-5.9) and after RTHA of 36.3 (Std. deviation-6.3) (p = 0.01). All implants were radiologically stable. CMA has demonstrated a good ability to restore position of hip centre of rotation (HCOR). In the postoperative period, two patients (2 hips) had dislocations. Only one of two patients underwent re-revision due to dislocation. Conclusion Treatment of uncontained loss of bone stock in RTHA using CMA shows promising clinical and radiographic results at short-term follow-up period; however, dislocation rate is 10% in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available