Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/WF21150
Keywords
alkalisation; ash; nature recovery; peatlands; smoldering; soil; The Netherlands; wildfire
Categories
Funding
- PyroLife ITN - European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme MSCA-ITN-2019 -Innovative Training Networks [860787]
- Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [860787] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The risk to vegetation and peat decomposition from alkaline ash inputs after peatland wildfire is poorly understood. This study found that ash inputs were insufficient to increase pH of the acidic peatland soil, and a significant amount of ash was required to cause a noticeable pH increase. The study suggests that elevated soil pH from ash input may be transient rather than long term.
Peatland wildfire frequency and severity are increasing globally owing to climate change. The direct risk of elevated greenhouse gas emissions from peat burning receives much attention, yet the risks to vegetation composition or peat decomposition from alkaline ash inputs are poorly understood. We explored whether ash produced during smoldering increases peatland topsoil (similar to 0-25 cm) pH through field observations and laboratory experiments. We assessed spatial patterns of smoldering and ash presence, and measured soil and ash pH after a peatland wildfire in the Netherlands. Additionally, a peat smoldering experiment was conducted to compare freshly produced ash pH with aged ash pH collected 2 months following the wildfire. Additionally, we assessed the amount of ash needed to increase soil pH. Results showed that ash inputs at the field site were insufficient to increase pH of the acidic peatland after the wildfire. Incubation experiments showed that a >= 3 cm ash layer (ash load 163 t ha(-1)) would be required to increase soil pH by at least I unit. Given that aged ash was slightly acidic and fresh ash was alkaline, leaching and neutralisation of ash after wildfire is likely, suggesting that elevated soil pH from ash input may be transient rather than long term.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available