4.7 Review

Application Progress of Modified Chitosan and Its Composite Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23126574

Keywords

modified chitosan; cross-linking; structure modification; bone tissue engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone tissue engineering has shown promise in replacing traditional treatment modalities, and chitosan-based composite scaffolds have proved to be a promising candidate for successful bone regeneration. Efforts have been made to modify chitosan to overcome its limitations and expand its applications in biomedical innovation and regenerative medicine.
In recent years, bone tissue engineering (BTE), as a multidisciplinary field, has shown considerable promise in replacing traditional treatment modalities (i.e., autografts, allografts, and xenografts). Since bone is such a complex and dynamic structure, the construction of bone tissue composite materials has become an attractive strategy to guide bone growth and regeneration. Chitosan and its derivatives have been promising vehicles for BTE owing to their unique physical and chemical properties. With intrinsic physicochemical characteristics and closeness to the extracellular matrix of bones, chitosan-based composite scaffolds have been proved to be a promising candidate for providing successful bone regeneration and defect repair capacity. Advances in chitosan-based scaffolds for BTE have produced efficient and efficacious bio-properties via material structural design and different modifications. Efforts have been put into the modification of chitosan to overcome its limitations, including insolubility in water, faster depolymerization in the body, and blood incompatibility. Herein, we discuss the various modification methods of chitosan that expand its fields of application, which would pave the way for future applied research in biomedical innovation and regenerative medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available