4.7 Article

Selective Elimination of Senescent Fibroblasts by Targeting the Cell Surface Protein ACKR3

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23126531

Keywords

senolysis; fibroblast; atypical chemokine receptor 3; antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity; natural killer cell

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP 20K18422]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accumulation of senescent cells in aging tissues is associated with age-related diseases and functional decline. A study found that atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) is selectively expressed on the surface of senescent human fibroblasts. This discovery allows for the selective elimination of senescent cells and could contribute to the development of novel senolysis approaches.
The accumulation of senescent cells in aging tissues is associated with age-related diseases and functional decline. Thus, senolysis, a therapy aimed at rejuvenation by removing senescent cells from the body, is being developed. However, this therapy requires the identification of membrane surface antigens that are specifically expressed on senescent cells for their selective elimination. We showed that atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3), a receptor of the CXC motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12) implicated in cancer, inflammation, and cardiovascular disorders, is selectively expressed on the surface of senescent human fibroblasts but not on proliferating cells. Importantly, the differential presence of ACKR3 enabled the isolation of senescent cells by flow cytometry using anti-ACKR3 antibodies. Furthermore, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity assays revealed that cell surface ACKR3 preferentially sensitizes senescent but not dividing fibroblasts to cell injury by natural killer cells. Conclusively, the selective expression of ACKR3 on the surface of senescent cells allows the preferential elimination of senescent cells. These results might contribute to the future development of novel senolysis approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available