4.7 Article

Sperm of Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster under Space Flight

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147498

Keywords

sperm motility; space flight; dynein; cytoskeleton; cellular respiration

Funding

  1. program for fundamental research SSC RF-IBMP RAS [65.4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies on the reproductive function under long-term space flight conditions are important for deep space exploration. The research found that the motility of Drosophila melanogaster spermatozoa decreased after space flight, but cellular respiration and protein expression remained unchanged. The use of specific inhibitors can restore the motility of sperm.
Studies of reproductive function under long-term space flight conditions are of interest in planning the exploration of deep space. Motility, including the use of various inhibitors, cellular respiration, and the content of cytoskeletal proteins were studied, assessing the level of expression of the corresponding genes in spermatozoa of Drosophila melanogaster, which were in space flight conditions for 12 days. The experiment was carried out twice on board the Russian Segment of the International Space Station. Sperm motility speed after space flight, and subsequently 16 h after landing, is reduced relative to the control by 20% (p < 0.05). In comparison with the simulation experiment, we showed that this occurs as a result of the action of overloads and readaptation to the Earth's gravity. At the same time, cellular respiration, the content of proteins of the respiratory chain, and the expression of their genes do not change. We used kinase inhibitor 6-(dimethylamino)purine (6-DMAP) and phosphatase inhibitors; 6-DMAP restored the reduced the speed of spermatozoa in the flight group to that of the control. These results can be useful in developing a strategy for protecting reproductive health during the development of other bodies in the solar system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available