4.7 Article

Resensitization of Fosfomycin-Resistant Escherichia coli Using the CRISPR System

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169175

Keywords

fosfomycin resistance; fosA3; CRISPR-Cas9

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. CAPES
  3. CNPq [424410/2018-4]
  4. InovaFiocruz/Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz grant [VPPCB-07-FIO-18-2-38]
  5. Fiocruz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antimicrobial resistance is a major global public health concern and was identified as one of the main causes of death in 2019. This study successfully restored the sensitivity to fosfomycin using a CRISPR-Cas9 system and identified effective guide RNAs for resensitization.
Antimicrobial resistance is a public health burden with worldwide impacts and was recently identified as one of the major causes of death in 2019. Fosfomycin is an antibiotic commonly used to treat urinary tract infections, and resistance to it in Enterobacteriaceae is mainly due to the metalloenzyme FosA3 encoded by the fosA3 gene. In this work, we adapted a CRISPR-Cas9 system named pRE-FOSA3 to restore the sensitivity of a fosA3(+) Escherichia coli strain. The fosA3(+) E. coli strain was generated by transforming synthetic fosA3 into a nonpathogenic E. coli TOP10. To mediate the fosA3 disruption, two guide RNAs (gRNAs) were selected that used conserved regions within the fosA3 sequence of more than 700 fosA3(+) E. coli isolates, and the resensitization plasmid pRE-FOSA3 was assembled by cloning the gRNA into pCas9. gRNA_195 exhibited 100% efficiency in resensitizing the bacteria to fosfomycin. Additionally, the edited strain lost the ampicillin resistance encoded in the same plasmid containing the synthetic fosA3 gene, despite not being the CRISPR-Cas9 target, indicating plasmid clearance. The in vitro analysis presented here points to a path that can be explored to assist the development of effective alternative methods of treatment against fosA3(+) bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available