Are We Ready to Implement Molecular Subtyping of Bladder Cancer in Clinical Practice? Part 2: Subtypes and Divergent Differentiation

Following several attempts to achieve a molecular stratification of bladder cancer (BC) over the last decade, a consensus classification has been recently developed to provide a common base for the molecular classification of bladder cancer (BC), encompassing a six-cluster scheme with distinct prognostic and predictive characteristics. In order to implement molecular subtyping (MS) as a risk stratification tool in routine practice, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been explored as a readily accessible, relatively inexpensive, standardized surrogate method, achieving promising results in different clinical settings. The second part of this review deals with the pathological and clinical features of the molecular clusters, both in conventional and divergent urothelial carcinoma, with a focus on the role of IHC-based subtyping.

Automated summary

A consensus classification has been developed for molecular stratification of bladder cancer (BC), which includes a six-cluster scheme. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been explored as a potential method for risk stratification and has shown promising results in different clinical settings.