4.7 Article

Total and Plant Protein Consumption: The Role of Inflammation and Risk of Non-Communicable Disease

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23148008

Keywords

plant protein; NCDs; inflammatory markers; healthy ageing

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Agricultural. Food and Forestry Policies [D.M. 25870/7303/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that older individuals had lower total protein intake and only a few consumed enough plant protein. Only older individuals who consumed more than 40% plant protein showed a lower risk of non-communicable diseases.
Background: Inflammatory cytokine levels are associated with Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) and can be influenced by a person's macronutrient profile. This work aims to evaluate the relationship between the compliance with the age-specific recommended protein intake and the levels of inflammatory markers related to the risk of NCDs. Methods: The study participants included 347 participants (119 men and 228 women), ages 18 to 86 years. Cardio-metabolic risk evaluations, including an assessment of the prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome, were performed. Leptin, IL-15, IL-6, and TNF-alpha levels were measured. Results: The adequacy of the total protein (TP) intake was lower in old people compared to individuals aged <60 years, and only few volunteers consumed the suggested 50% plant protein (PP) for a healthy and sustainable diet. A lower risk of NCDs with a PP consumption above at least 40% was observed only in old individuals. A differential effect on TNF-alpha and IL-6 was observed for both TP and PP intake by gender and age class, whereas for leptin and IL-15 only significant interactions among sex and the class of age were found. Conclusion: Although our data suggest that consuming more than 40% of PP can reduce the risk of NCDs, the effect of gender differences on cytokine levels should be considered in larger studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available