4.2 Article

GUP-corrected thermodynamics and remnant of a black hole in Horndeski theory

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS A
Volume 37, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0217751X2250124X

Keywords

Hawking radiation; generalized uncertainty principle; Klein-Gordon equation; Dirac equation; quantum tunneling; black hole thermodynamics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12065013]
  2. Fund for Reserve Talents of Young and Middleaged Academic and Technical Leaders of Yunnan Province [2018HB006]
  3. Yunnan High-level Talent Training Support Plan Young & Elite Talents Project [YNWR-QNBJ-2018-360]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the effects of the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) on Hawking radiation of scalar particles and fermions tunneling of the Babichev-Charmousis black hole. By modifying the Klein-Gordon equation and Dirac equation, the corrected Hawking temperature and thermodynamic quantities are derived. It is found that the corrected temperature depends on the GUP parameter and there exist minimum mass and minimum entropy.
This paper is devoted to study the effects of the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) on Hawking radiation of scalar particles and fermions tunneling of Babichev-Charmousis black hole by using Hamilton-Jacobi method. To this end, we modify the Klein-Gordon equation (K-G equation) and Dirac equation firstly on account of GUP. Then, we apply the semiclassical WKB approximation to derive the corrected Hawking temperature of scalar particles and fermions tunneling process and corresponding corrected thermodynamics quantities of this black hole. We find that the corrected temperature depends on GUP parameter alpha. Furthermore, the existence of minimal mass and minimal entropy implies that when the evaporation of the black hole stops, it will leave a remnant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available