4.7 Article

Finite element modelling of low velocity impact test applied to biaxial glass fiber reinforced laminate composites

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104218

Keywords

Composite laminate; Impact test; Failure criteria; Damage; Finite element simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dynamic behavior of biaxial glass fiber reinforced laminate composites under low velocity impact test is described in this paper through finite element modeling and experimental investigations. The proposed model shows good correlation with experimental results and captures the progressive dynamic failure of the laminate composite.
The aim of this paper is to describe the dynamic behavior of biaxial glass fiber reinforced laminate composites under low velocity impact test through finite element modelling. Experimental investigations by impact test performed using an instrumented drop weight testing machine were conducted on three-point bending composite samples in order to assess their impact damage resistance. Moreover, the experimental setup allowed the visu-alization of real-time damage progression of the impacted laminate composite via high-speed camera Phantom V2512 enabling to capture 83000 frames per second. Dynamic strain fields were extracted by Digital Image Correlation (DIC) method. Based on the experimental results, a numerical study of the impacted specimens was developed as a user subroutine VUMAT integrated to ABAQUS/Explicit in order to precisely capture the pro-gressive dynamic failure of the laminate composite under impact test. In the proposed model, the damage and failure of each ply are accounted by a Hashin 3D damage-based behavior, and a cohesive zone model is employed to capture the onset and progression of inter-laminar delamination. A good experimental-numerical correlation was obtained for peak force and failure modes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available