4.7 Article

On the nature of energy-horizon and determination of length scales in dynamic fragmentation of rocks

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104242

Keywords

Fragmentation; Energy-horizon; Energy criterion; Length scales; Maxwell model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [12172036, 51774018, 51478027]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) [IRT_17R06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grady's energy-horizon theory of dynamic fragmentation (EHTDF) is reviewed and a new approach for determining the related dynamic fragmentation length scales is proposed. The study combines energy-based criteria and static size effect law with the relation between dynamic strength, strain rate, and fragment size obtained from the Maxwell model of rock deformation and fracture. The comparison between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements validates the proposed approach.
Grady's energy-horizon theory of dynamic fragmentation (EHTDF) is reviewed. The energy-horizon essence is explored, and a new approach for determining the related dynamic fragmentation length scales is proposed. It is shown that energy-horizon is the effective size of the equivalent sample covered by dynamic disturbance, and the lower energy-equilibrium failure criterion in Grady's EHTDF may be replaced by static size effect law, with the upper bounding failure criterion curve used instead of the energy-based criterion. The length scales in Grady's EHTDF can be determined by combining the energy-based criterion and static size effect law with the relation between dynamic strength, strain rate, and fragment size obtained from the Maxwell model of rock deformation and fracture. Comparison of the theoretically predicted and the experimentally measured values of length scales in dynamic fragmentation of rock shows the validity of the proposed approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available