4.7 Article

Crosslinked anion exchange membranes with regional intensive ion clusters prepared from quaternized branched polyethyleneimine/quaternized polysulfone

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 47, Issue 59, Pages 24991-25006

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.237

Keywords

Anion exchange membrane (AEM); Quaternized polysulfone (QPSU); Quaternized branched; polyethyleneimine (QBPEI); Ion clusters

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51803136]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2021YFG0245]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AEMs with regionally dense ion clusters were prepared by crosslinking QPSU with QBPEI. Among them, QPSU/QBPEI-3 AEM exhibited the best performance, with good ionic conductivity and stability at high temperature.
A series of anion exchange membranes (AEMs) with regionally dense ion clusters are prepared by crosslinking quaternized polysulfone (QPSU) with quaternized branched polyethyleneimine (QBPEI). For the as-prepared QPSU/QBPEI AEMs, the hydrophilic QBPEI forms locally aggregated ion clusters in the QPSU matrix, which can promote the formation of an obvious microphase separation structure in the membrane. The QPSU/QBPEI-3 AEM with an ion exchange capacity of 1.88 meq/g exhibits the best performance, achieving a reasonably high ionic conductivity of 66.14 mS/cm at 80 degrees C and showing good oxidation stability and alkali resistance. Finally, the maximum power density of a single H-2/O-2 fuel cell with QPSU/QBPEI-3 AEM reaches 75.34 mW/cm(2) at 80 degrees C. The above results indicate that QBPEI with a dendritic structure and abundant anionic conductive groups has a good application prospect in the preparation of AEMs with locally aggregated ion clusters and microphase separation structures. (C) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available