4.7 Article

Application of biochar derived from used cigarette filters in direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 47, Issue 54, Pages 22972-22980

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.102

Keywords

Direct carbon fuel cells; Solid oxide fuel cell; Carbon fuel; Boudouard reaction; Fe catalyst

Funding

  1. Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [202102020685]
  2. Research Fund Program of Key Laboratory of Fuel Cell Technology of Guang- dong Province, Department of Education of Guangdong Prov- ince Project [2021KQNCX008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports a superior DC-SOFC powered by Fe-loaded used cigarette filter (UCF) biochar. The UCF biochar, characterized by its micron-sized structure and metal elements beneficial to the performance of DC-SOFC, serves as a feasible fuel with a peak power density of 341 mW cm-2.
As a typical waste, used cigarette filters (UCFs) are difficult to biodegrade and harmful to the environment. The direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell (DC-SOFC) is an energy conversion device that can utilize carbon directly, including biochar, as fuel. We report a superior DCSOFC powered by Fe-loaded UCF biochar in this paper. The microstructure and composition are characterized, indicating that the UCF biochar is micron-sized and contains metal elements such as K and Ca that are beneficial to the performance of DC-SOFC. The peak power density of the cell fueled by pure UCF biochar is 308 mW cm-2 and increases to 341 mW cm-2 after loading Fe as the catalyst, which is comparable to that of the cell with Fe-loaded activated carbon (368 mW cm-2). It proves the feasibility of the UCF biochar as fuel for DC-SOFCs, providing a theoretical basis and technical demonstration for the disposal and transformation of solid waste. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available