4.5 Article

Design of auxiliary model and hierarchical normalized fractional adaptive algorithms for parameter estimation of bilinear-in-parameter systems

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acs.3471

Keywords

auxiliary model; bilinear-in-parameter system; fractional adaptive algorithms; hierarchical identification; parameter estimation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62003249, 62073250, 62173262]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the parameter identification issues of bilinear-in-parameter systems through fractional adaptive algorithms. The proposed algorithms, based on auxiliary model identification idea and convergence index, provide improved accuracy and computational efficiency for parameter estimation. Numerical simulations further verify the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed algorithms.
This study investigates the parameter identification issues of bilinear-in-parameter systems through fractional adaptive algorithms. An auxiliary model based epsilon-normalized$$ \varepsilon \hbox{-} \mathrm{normalized} $$ modified fractional least mean square algorithm is proposed for accelerating the parameter estimation accuracy based on the auxiliary model identification idea and the introduced convergence index, a normalized modified hierarchical fractional least mean square algorithm is presented for improving the computational efficiency based on the hierarchical identification principle. The proposed normalized fractional adaptive strategies are effective and could provide more accurate parameter estimates comparing with conventional counterparts for bilinear-in-parameter identification model based on the mean square error metrics and the average predicted output error. The effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed algorithms are further verified and validated through numerical simulations for different noise variances, fractional orders and gain parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available