Journal
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 3951-3964Publisher
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2021.3125798
Keywords
Maximum likelihood estimation; Computational modeling; Wireless communication; Precoding; Synchronization; Data models; Channel estimation; Federated edge learning; over-the-air computations; asynchronous; maximum likelihood estimation; sum-product algorithm
Funding
- European Research Council Project BEACON [677854]
- CHIST-ERA [CHIST-ERA-18-SDCDN-001, EPSRC-EP/T023600/1]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper investigates the problem of misaligned over-the-air computation for federated edge learning and proposes a whitened matched filtering and sampling scheme to obtain oversampled, independent samples from misaligned signals, with two main estimators designed to estimate the arithmetic sum of transmitted symbols. Simulation results show different impacts on test accuracy between the aligned-sample estimator and the ML estimator under various EsN0 scenarios.
Over-the-air computation (OAC) is a promising technique to realize fast model aggregation in the uplink of federated edge learning (FEEL). OAC, however, hinges on accurate channel-gain precoding and strict synchronization among edge devices, which are challenging in practice. As such, how to design the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator in the presence of residual channel-gain mismatch and asynchronies is an open problem. To fill this gap, this paper formulates the problem of misaligned OAC for FEEL and puts forth a whitened matched filtering and sampling scheme to obtain oversampled, but independent samples from the misaligned and overlapped signals. Given the whitened samples, a sum-product ML (SP-ML) estimator and an aligned-sample estimator are devised to estimate the arithmetic sum of the transmitted symbols. In particular, the computational complexity of our SP-ML estimator is linear in the packet length, and hence is significantly lower than the conventional ML estimator. Extensive simulations on the test accuracy versus the average received energy per symbol to noise power spectral density ratio (EsN0) yield two main results: 1) In the low EsN0 regime, the aligned-sample estimator can achieve superior test accuracy provided that the phase misalignment is not severe. In contrast, the ML estimator does not work well due to the error propagation and noise enhancement in the estimation process. 2) In the high EsN0 regime, the ML estimator attains the optimal learning performance regardless of the severity of phase misalignment. On the other hand, the aligned-sample estimator suffers from a test-accuracy loss caused by phase misalignment.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available