4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Testing and Validation Methodology for a Radiation Monitoring System for Electronics in Particle Accelerators

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE
Volume 69, Issue 7, Pages 1642-1650

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2022.3158527

Keywords

Qualifications; Wireless communication; Wireless sensor networks; Reliability; Testing; Radiation monitoring; Sensor systems; High energy hadrons; radiation hardness assurance (RHA); radiation monitoring (RadMON); system level testing; thermal neutrons (ThNs); total ionizing dose (TID)

Funding

  1. French National Program Programme d'Investissement d'Avenir
  2. IRT Nanoelec [ANR-10-AIRT-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a methodology for the design and validation of a radiation monitoring system for electronic systems in particle accelerators. The methodology expands the traditional radiation hardness assurance procedure and demonstrates its effectiveness through a case study.
In this work, a methodology for the design and validation of a radiation monitoring (RadMON) system for electronic systems in particle accelerators is presented. The methodology expands the common radiation hardness assurance (RHA) procedure implemented at CERN, including new steps dedicated to both system-level testing, focused on a wireless device, and sensors characterization and readout validation. A case study demonstrating the validity of this methodology is proposed with the qualification of a novel battery-powered wireless RadMON system. This system not only represents the validation vehicle of the methodology but also an innovation in terms of monitoring platform due to its flexibility and improved capabilities. The application of this methodology allowed its full qualification, providing useful data in terms of resistance to radiation, lifetime, and failure rate in operation, demonstrating the validity of the testing strategy proposed in the article.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available