4.5 Article

Silicon Photomultipliers Coupled to Scintillators With the Emission Maximum at 550 nm

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE
Volume 69, Issue 7, Pages 1799-1805

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2022.3179823

Keywords

Scintillators; Detectors; Temperature measurement; Photonics; Energy resolution; Semiconductor device measurement; Optical surface waves; Cesium iodide; gadolinium yttrium gallium aluminum garnet; gamma spectroscopy; scintillation detector; silicon photomultiplier

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office [IAA HSHQDN-17-X-00016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the performance differences of RGB SiPM and blue-sensitive SiPM for different scintillators, as well as the impact of temperature on energy resolution. The study also suggests the further development of RGB SiPM with lower DCR and higher operating temperatures.
A majority of the silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) are sensitive to blue and near-ultraviolet (NUV) photons that are not optimized for scintillators with the emission maximum at wavelengths longer than 500 nm. The red-green-blue (RGB) SiPM is developed for the maximum photon detection efficiency (PDE) at 550 nm, which is a good match for some high-light-yield scintillators, such as CsI:Tl (CsI) and Gd1.5Y1.5Ga2Al3O12:Ce (GYGAG). Comparisons are made for the performance of these scintillators coupled to the RGB SiPM and a blue-sensitive SiPM. Because it takes tens of nanoseconds for the microcells to recharge after registering a photon hit, the linearity of these scintillation detectors was studied for high-energy gammas where numerous scintillation photons are generated. In addition, the energy resolution of the 662-keV gamma emitted by Cs-137 was measured for temperatures between -20 degrees C and 50 degrees C. The nonlinearity was observed above 1 MeV for all measurements, and however, it can be corrected by energy calibration using a third-degree polynomial. For CsI, the energy resolution is better with the blue-sensitive SiPM because of the lower dark count rate (DCR). In contrast, GYGAG coupled to the RGB SiPM has a better energy resolution for temperatures below 30 degrees C because of the well-matched emission spectrum and PDE distribution. Nevertheless, the advantage disappears for temperatures above 30 degrees C due to the higher DCR. It would be useful to further develop the RGB SiPM with a lower DCR and higher operating temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available