4.7 Article

DSNet: A Dual-Stream Framework for Weakly-Supervised Gigapixel Pathology Image Analysis

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 41, Issue 8, Pages 2180-2190

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3157983

Keywords

Visualization; Encoding; Annotations; Redundancy; Pathology; Metastasis; Image analysis; Weakly-supervised training; image classification; whole slide images

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a novel weakly-supervised framework for classifying whole slide images (WSIs), which integrates information at both local and regional levels for better classification performance.
We present a novel weakly-supervised framework for classifying whole slide images (WSIs). WSIs, due to their gigapixel resolution, are commonly processed by patch-wise classification with patch-level labels. However, patch-level labels require precise annotations, which is expensive and usually unavailable on clinical data. With image-level labels only, patch-wise classification would be sub-optimal due to inconsistency between the patch appearance and image-level label. To address this issue, we posit that WSI analysis can be effectively conducted by integrating information at both high magnification (local) and low magnification (regional) levels. We auto-encode the visual signals in each patch into a latent embedding vector representing local information, and down-sample the raw WSI to hardware-acceptable thumbnails representing regional information. The WSI label is then predicted with a Dual-Stream Network (DSNet), which takes the transformed local patch embeddings and multi-scale thumbnail images as inputs and can be trained by the image-level label only. Experiments conducted on three large-scale public datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms all recent state-of-the-art weakly-supervised WSI classification methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available