4.8 Article

Model-Free Predictive Current Control of SPMSM Drives Using Extended State Observer

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 69, Issue 7, Pages 6540-6550

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3095816

Keywords

Inductance; Stators; Resistance; Predictive models; Inverters; Couplings; Voltage control; Machine parameter mismatch; model-free predictive current control (MFPCC); surfaced permanent magnet synchronous machine (SPMSM)

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore [NRF-NRFF122020-0003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel model-free predictive current control method for surfaced permanent magnet synchronous machines, which can effectively suppress disturbances caused by machine parameter mismatch. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Conventional predictive control (PC) has been employed for machine drives due to good dynamic response and easy implementation. However, the disturbance caused by machine parameter mismatch is one of main barriers to its widespread application. In order to deal with this issue, this work proposes a novel model-free predictive current control (MFPCC) for surfaced permanent magnet synchronous machines (SPMSM). The contribution of this work is that a novel extended state observer (ESO) is proposed and the proposed MFPCC only utilizes the input and output knowledge of the plant without using any machine parameter in controller, which can effectively suppress the disturbances. In addition, the effect of the initial machine inductance parameter mismatch on the conventional ESO of MFPCC is analyzed in detail. The proposed MFPCC is validated and compared against three methods, namely PC without ESO, PC using ESO, and MFPCC using ESO. The experimental results have been carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed MFPCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available