4.4 Article

Compensating Method of Equivalent Current Sources of LSI-Core Macromodel Considering Voltage Fluctuations in On-Chip Power Distribution Network

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages 1250-1256

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEMC.2022.3155471

Keywords

Voltage; Integrated circuit modeling; System-on-chip; Large scale integration; SPICE; Switches; Partial discharges; EMC macromodel; ICEM-CE; LECCS-core; operating current; power bounce

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes an EMC macromodel for predicting RF emission and power integrity issues inside an LSI, with compensation of equivalent current sources using correction factors to account for voltage fluctuations in on-chip PDN. This method addresses the issues arising from transient supply voltage fluctuations.
Electro-magnetic compatibility (EMC) macromodels of a large-scale integrated (LSI) circuit core have been proposed to predict conducted RF emission and power integrity issues not only on a printed circuit board but also inside an LSI. They are equivalent circuit models that consist of lumped element impedance blocks of an LSI-core and equivalent current sources expressing internal switching activities. In conventional macromodeling, equivalent current sources have been extracted under ideal power supply conditions, i.e., with constant supply voltage. However, there exists transient supply voltage fluctuations in an actual on-chip power distribution network (PDN), and the operating current and its equivalent current sources are expected to vary with such fluctuations. Such issues with transient supply voltage fluctuations have not been extensively investigated. We propose a method of compensating the equivalent current sources of a macromodel by introducing amplitude and time correction factors, taking into account the voltage fluctuations in an on-chip PDN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available