4.5 Article

Improving Interference Analysis for Real-Time DAG Tasks Under Partitioned Scheduling

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS
Volume 71, Issue 7, Pages 1495-1506

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TC.2021.3092181

Keywords

Real-time systems; partitioned scheduling; directed acyclic graph; response time analysis

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFB1406902]
  2. Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2020B0101360001]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research and Development Fundation [JCYJ20190806143418198]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61872110]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on the worst-case response time analysis of DAG tasks under partitioned scheduling on multiprocessors. A new offline scheduling analysis algorithm called reducing repetitive calculation (RRC) is proposed. Experimental results show that RRC outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of analysis accuracy.
Real-time systems with strict timing constraints have been widely applied in many fields. The Directed acyclic graph (DAG) task model has been widely studied and applied to model real-time systems with partial parallelism and precedence constraints in each task. Our paper focuses on the worst-case response time (WCRT) analysis of DAG tasks under partitioned scheduling on multiprocessors. We investigate a parallel structure named Str, which helps obtain more accurate analysis results, and propose a new offline scheduling analysis algorithm named reducing repetitive calculation (RRC). Experiments with synthetic workload are conducted to compare the results calculated by RRC and the state-of-the-art, as well as the observed average response time on a real embedded system. Results show that RRC has better performance in terms of analysis accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available