4.7 Article

Interactive Nearest Lattice Point Search in a Distributed Setting: Two Dimensions

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 70, Issue 8, Pages 5128-5139

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2022.3184170

Keywords

Lattices; lattice quantization; nearest lattice point problem; communication complexity; distributed function computation; distributed compression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nearest lattice point problem in R-n is discussed in a distributed network, aiming to minimize the error probability while considering communication constraints. Algorithms with different number of communication rounds are compared for n = 2, and expressions for the error probability as well as the communication cost are derived. It is found that the hexagonal lattice, despite its communication efficiency, is the most expensive in terms of communication cost.
The nearest lattice point problem in R-n is formulated in a distributed network with n nodes. The objective is to minimize the probability that an incorrect lattice point is found, subject to a constraint on inter-node communication. Algorithms with a single as well as an unbounded number of rounds of communication are considered for the case n = 2. For the algorithm with a single round, expressions are derived for the error probability as a function of the total number of communicated bits. We observe that the error exponent depends on the lattice structure and that zero error requires an infinite number of communicated bits. In contrast, with an infinite number of allowed communication rounds, the nearest lattice point can be determined without error with a finite average number of communicated bits and a finite average number of rounds of communication. In two dimensions, the hexagonal lattice, which is most efficient for communication and compression, is found to be the most expensive in terms of communication cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available