4.7 Article

Camera-Augmented Non-Contact Vital Sign Monitoring in Real Time

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 11965-11978

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3172559

Keywords

Radar; Cameras; Monitoring; Sensors; Heart rate; Estimation; Real-time systems; RGB-D camera; FMCW radar; non-contact monitoring; real-time vital sign monitoring; sensor fusion

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [80NSSC20C0117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study develops a camera-guided FMCW radar to monitor vital signs. A novel method, SVPD, is designed to optimize the regions of interest for respiratory rate and heart rate monitoring. Experimental results demonstrate high accuracy in extracting vital signs under different conditions.
This study develops a camera-guided frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar to monitor vital signs. A red-green-blue-depth (RGB-D) camera estimates the human torso landmarks and a processing unit constantly adapts the radar beams to the direction of the subjects. To constantly optimize the regions of interest for monitoring respiratory rate (RR) and heart rate (HR), a novel method, coined singular value-based point detection (SVPD), is designed. Vital sign extraction is then followed as the last step. Experiments are conducted for the cases of single-subject (10 subjects, 31 scenarios, and 1550 repetitions) and dual-subject monitoring (6 subjects, 6 scenarios, and 90 repetitions). Average (RR, HR) accuracies of (97.68%, 85.88%), (90.02%, 86.05%), (96.71%, 89.50%), and (97.52%, 86.71%) are achieved for the range of distances (0.5-2.5 m), azimuth angles (0 degrees-30 degrees), elevation angles (-30 degrees-+30 degrees), and incident angles (-30 degrees-+30 degrees), respectively. The higher chest and upper abdomen are determined as the optimal regions for RR and HR estimation respectively, with average accuracies of 98.31% and 86.93%. Finally, the capability of dual-subject monitoring at various inter-subject distances (range of 20-70 cm) is confirmed with average accuracies of 92.26% and 73.23% for RR and HR respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available