4.7 Article

Low-Cost Formaldehyde Sensor Evaluation and Calibration in a Controlled Environment

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 11791-11802

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3172864

Keywords

Sensors; Gas detectors; Temperature sensors; Calibration; Metals; Sensor phenomena and characterization; Pollution measurement; Air quality monitoring; formaldehyde detection; metal oxide semiconductor; electrochemical sensors; machine learning; gas sensors

Funding

  1. European Union [UIA03-240]
  2. Academy of Finland [307537, 337549]
  3. Business Finland [7517/31/2018]
  4. EU [689443]
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [307537] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated different low-cost gas sensors to create a suitable mobile sensing node and developed a calibration algorithm. In a controlled chamber, the performance of electrochemical sensors and metal oxide sensors was compared, with uncalibrated electrochemical sensors showing superior performance and being selected for the mobile sensing node.
Formaldehyde is a carcinogenic indoor air pollutant emitted from common wood-based materials. Low-cost sensing of formaldehyde is difficult due to inaccuracies in measuring low concentrations and susceptibility of sensors to changing indoor environmental conditions. Currently gas sensors are calibrated by manufacturers using simplistic models which fail to capture their complex behaviour. We evaluated different low-cost gas sensors to ascertain a suitable component to create a mobile sensing node and built a calibration algorithm to correct it. We compared the performance of 2 electrochemical sensors and 3 metal oxide sensors in a controlled chamber against a photo-acoustic reference device. In the chamber the formaldehyde concentrations, temperature and humidity were varied to assess the sensors in diverse environments. Pre-calibration, the electrochemical sensors (mean absolute error (MAE) = 70.8 ppb) outperformed the best performing metal oxide sensor (MAE = 335 ppb). A two-stage calibration model was built, using linear regression followed by random forest, where the residual of the first stage acted as a input for the second. Post-calibration, the metal oxide sensors (MAE = 154 ppb) improved compared to their electrochemical counterparts (MAE = 78.8 ppb). Nevertheless, the uncalibrated electrochemical sensor showed overall superior performance hence was selected for the mobile sensing node.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available