4.5 Review

Impact of risk factors related to metabolic syndrome on acute myocardial infarction in younger patients

Journal

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 9, Pages 1447-1458

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-00951-y

Keywords

Metabolic syndrome; Myocardial infarction; Risk factors; Younger patients

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite advancements in cardiovascular medicine, myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major concern for younger patients, with plaque rupture or erosion being the most common cause, often related to obesity and metabolic syndrome. The prevention and treatment of metabolic syndrome-related risk factors are crucial for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, particularly MI, in younger patients.
Despite diagnostic and therapeutic advancements in cardiovascular medicine, myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major cause of adverse outcomes in younger MI patients, i.e., those who are aged 55 years or younger. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors have not often been emphasized in the management of younger MI patients. However, plaque rupture or erosion, which is deeply related to cardiovascular risk factors, remains the most common etiology of MI even in younger patients. The global increase in the prevalence of obesity underscores the clinical importance of metabolic syndrome (MetS), i.e., obesity-associated cardiovascular risk factors, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus and particularly hypertension, in younger people. The concept of lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease reinforces the need for prevention or treatment of MetS. This review focuses on the risk factors related to MetS and an overall understanding of recent profiles of younger MI patients. We hope that this review will aid in the primary prevention of MetS-related risk factors and the prevention of cardiovascular disease, particularly MI, in younger patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available