Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Changes in opinions about human germline gene editing as a result of the Dutch DNA-dialogue project
Diewertje Houtman et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2023)
Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing
Bonginkosi Shozi et al.
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2022)
Walking a Fine Germline: Synthesizing Public Opinion and Legal Precedent to Develop Policy Recommendations for Heritable Gene-Editing
Shawna Benston
JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY (2022)
Public attitudes in the clinical application of genome editing on human embryos in Japan: a cross-sectional survey across multiple stakeholders
Shinobu Kobayashi et al.
JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2022)
Governance of Heritable Human Gene Editing World-Wide and Beyond
Yang Xue et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (2022)
Toward anticipatory governance of human genome editing: a critical review of scholarly governance discourse
John P. Nelson et al.
JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION (2021)
Global Governance of Human Genome Editing: What Are the Rules?
Gary E. Marchant
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENOMICS AND HUMAN GENETICS, VOL 22, 2021 (2021)
Toward inclusive global governance of human genome editing
Hanzhi Yu et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2021)
Germline genome editing: Moratorium, hard law, or an informed adaptive consensus?
Terry Kaan et al.
PLOS GENETICS (2021)
ISSCR Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: The 2021 update
Robin Lovell-Badge et al.
STEM CELL REPORTS (2021)
The View from the Benches: Scientists' Perspectives on the Uses and Governance of Human Gene-Editing Research
Margaret Waltz et al.
CRISPR JOURNAL (2021)
Mapping people's positions regarding the acceptability of somatic gene therapy
Cecil Fraux et al.
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE (2021)
Public and Stakeholder Engagement in Developing Human Heritable Genome Editing Policies: What Does it Mean and What Should it Mean?
Ana S. Iltis et al.
FRONTIERS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE (2021)
Global citizen deliberation on genome editing
John S. Dryzek et al.
SCIENCE (2020)
Attitudes of Members of Genetics Professional Societies Toward Human Gene Editing
Alyssa J. Armsby et al.
CRISPR JOURNAL (2019)
Attitudes Toward Hypothetical Uses of Gene-Editing Technologies in Parents of People with Autosomal Aneuploidies
Erika Snure Beckman et al.
CRISPR JOURNAL (2019)
Democratic Governance of Human Germline Genome Editing
Sheila Jasanoff et al.
CRISPR JOURNAL (2019)
Where Will We Draw the Line? Public Opinions of Human Gene Editing
Kirsten A. Riggan et al.
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH (2019)
Building Capacity for a Global Genome Editing Observatory: Conceptual Challenges
J. Benjamin Hurlbut et al.
TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY (2018)
SCIENCE AND SOCIETY U.S. attitudes on human genome editing
Dietram A. Scheufele et al.
SCIENCE (2017)
Global standards for stem-cell research
Jonathan Kimmelman et al.
NATURE (2016)
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes
Puping Liang et al.
PROTEIN & CELL (2015)
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Le Cong et al.
SCIENCE (2013)
A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Martin Jinek et al.
SCIENCE (2012)
The Evolution of Policy Issues in Stem Cell Research: An International Survey
Timothy Caulfield et al.
STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS (2012)
Professions in a globalizing world: Towards a transnational sociology of the professions
James R. Faulconbridge et al.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIOLOGY (2012)
Golden Age, Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work
Elizabeth H. Gorman et al.
WORK AND OCCUPATIONS (2011)
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis
HF Hsieh et al.
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH (2005)