☆ 4.5 Article

Scientists' Views on Scientific Self-Governance for Human Genome Editing Research

HUMAN GENE THERAPY (2022)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Changes in opinions about human germline gene editing as a result of the Dutch DNA-dialogue project

Diewertje Houtman et al.

Summary: This study examines the outcomes of a public dialogue project about Human Germline Genome Editing (HGGE) in the Netherlands. The results show that the majority of the Dutch population agrees with the use of HGGE to prevent severe genetic diseases, but not for protection against infectious diseases or enhancement. Participation in dialogue appears to reduce negative opinions about HGGE, but there is no evidence that it changes acceptance rates.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Ethics

Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing

Bonginkosi Shozi et al.

Summary: While WHO has established the Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing and published a Draft Governance Framework, there are four key areas of concern that need to be addressed: ensuring safety and efficacy, balancing global standard setting with state sovereignty, understanding varying conceptualizations of human dignity, and clarifying the meaning of harm to the interests of a future person. Addressing these concerns may lead to a promising future for the global governance of human genome editing.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Ethics

Walking a Fine Germline: Synthesizing Public Opinion and Legal Precedent to Develop Policy Recommendations for Heritable Gene-Editing

Shawna Benston

Summary: This article presents a research proposal to provide ethical policy recommendations for policymakers regarding gene editing. The proposal suggests conducting a comprehensive review of the history and foundation of gene editing, followed by empirical research involving surveys of key stakeholder groups to understand their knowledge and opinions on gene editing.

JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Genetics & Heredity

Public attitudes in the clinical application of genome editing on human embryos in Japan: a cross-sectional survey across multiple stakeholders

Shinobu Kobayashi et al.

Summary: Recent advances in genome editing technology have raised public expectations for its potential clinical applications. However, there are still scientific, ethical, and social considerations that need to be addressed. In Japan, discussions are ongoing regarding the clinical use of genome editing in human embryos. This study aims to understand the public's sentiment and attitude towards this technology in order to guide policy-making and regulatory decisions. The findings suggest differences in attitudes towards the clinical use of genome editing across stakeholder groups, highlighting the importance of incorporating diverse opinions and public awareness in decision-making processes.

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Environmental Sciences

Governance of Heritable Human Gene Editing World-Wide and Beyond

Yang Xue et al.

Summary: This paper highlights the predicaments of governance on germline engineering, suggesting the need to build a scientific culture informed by ethics and education and to institutionalize policies in grassroots practice. Democratic deliberation between the public and the global scientific community, similar to the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), is crucial for achieving these goals.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (2022)

Add to Collection

Review Ethics

Toward anticipatory governance of human genome editing: a critical review of scholarly governance discourse

John P. Nelson et al.

Summary: The article examines scholarly discourse about human genome editing (HGE) through an anticipatory governance (AG) lens, identifying gaps in discussion regarding the institutional and systemic contexts of HGE work. Broader and more inclusive efforts in foresight and public engagement are recommended to better identify public values relevant to HGE and actions to promote them.

JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Genetics & Heredity

Global Governance of Human Genome Editing: What Are the Rules?

Gary E. Marchant

Summary: Human gene editing, categorized into somatic therapy, heritable gene editing, genetic enhancement, and research, is subject to varying degrees of governance globally, especially in terms of heritable gene editing and genetic enhancement. The differences in regulatory approaches among different nations highlight the complex nature of human gene editing and call for a polycentric approach in governance.

ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENOMICS AND HUMAN GENETICS, VOL 22, 2021 (2021)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Toward inclusive global governance of human genome editing

Hanzhi Yu et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Genetics & Heredity

Germline genome editing: Moratorium, hard law, or an informed adaptive consensus?

Terry Kaan et al.

Summary: With the advancement of human germline genome editing technology, there is a growing call for stricter regulation over interventions that may have heritable effects on future generations. The traditional mechanisms of international and municipal laws may not be effective in achieving the intended goals, and researchers suggest engaging with stakeholders in the international community to develop an informed consensus.

PLOS GENETICS (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Cell & Tissue Engineering

ISSCR Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: The 2021 update

Robin Lovell-Badge et al.

Summary: The International Society for Stem Cell Research has updated its Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation to address advances in the field and the associated ethical, social, and policy issues. The basic principles remain unchanged while serving as a standard resource for scientists, regulators, and the public.

STEM CELL REPORTS (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Genetics & Heredity

The View from the Benches: Scientists' Perspectives on the Uses and Governance of Human Gene-Editing Research

Margaret Waltz et al.

Summary: The survey of 212 scientists using gene editing revealed that they are more supportive of gene editing for treatment rather than for prevention, and there is little support for its use for enhancement. Levels of support for somatic editing differ depending on the specific condition. While almost all respondents believe scientists and national government representatives should be involved in oversight, only a minority believe scientists are best positioned to oversee gene-editing research.

CRISPR JOURNAL (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Psychology, Applied

Mapping people's positions regarding the acceptability of somatic gene therapy

Cecil Fraux et al.

Summary: A study on French people's positions regarding somatic gene therapy found six qualitatively different positions, with the majority of participants showing acceptance of gene therapy, regardless of the type of pathology.

EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE (2021)

Add to Collection

Review International Relations

Public and Stakeholder Engagement in Developing Human Heritable Genome Editing Policies: What Does it Mean and What Should it Mean?

Ana S. Iltis et al.

Summary: As scientific research continues to push boundaries, new discoveries and technologies bring about ethical and social questions, sparking varying public responses. The use of precise gene editing tools on human embryos, like CRISPR-Cas9, raises substantial disagreement due to deeply rooted ethical concerns tied to moral and religious beliefs. Scientists and policymakers are increasingly calling for public engagement in developing guidelines and policies for governing scientific practice.

FRONTIERS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE (2021)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Global citizen deliberation on genome editing

John S. Dryzek et al.

SCIENCE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Genetics & Heredity

Attitudes of Members of Genetics Professional Societies Toward Human Gene Editing

Alyssa J. Armsby et al.

CRISPR JOURNAL (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Genetics & Heredity

Attitudes Toward Hypothetical Uses of Gene-Editing Technologies in Parents of People with Autosomal Aneuploidies

Erika Snure Beckman et al.

CRISPR JOURNAL (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Genetics & Heredity

Democratic Governance of Human Germline Genome Editing

Sheila Jasanoff et al.

CRISPR JOURNAL (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Where Will We Draw the Line? Public Opinions of Human Gene Editing

Kirsten A. Riggan et al.

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH (2019)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Building Capacity for a Global Genome Editing Observatory: Conceptual Challenges

J. Benjamin Hurlbut et al.

TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Ethics

The Precision Medicine Nation

Maya Sabatello et al.

HASTINGS CENTER REPORT (2017)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

SCIENCE AND SOCIETY U.S. attitudes on human genome editing

Dietram A. Scheufele et al.

SCIENCE (2017)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Global standards for stem-cell research

Jonathan Kimmelman et al.

NATURE (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Cell Biology

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes

Puping Liang et al.

PROTEIN & CELL (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems

Le Cong et al.

SCIENCE (2013)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity

Martin Jinek et al.

SCIENCE (2012)

Add to Collection

Article Cell & Tissue Engineering

The Evolution of Policy Issues in Stem Cell Research: An International Survey

Timothy Caulfield et al.

STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS (2012)

Add to Collection

Article Sociology

Professions in a globalizing world: Towards a transnational sociology of the professions

James R. Faulconbridge et al.

INTERNATIONAL SOCIOLOGY (2012)

Add to Collection

Article Industrial Relations & Labor

Golden Age, Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work

Elizabeth H. Gorman et al.

WORK AND OCCUPATIONS (2011)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Three approaches to qualitative content analysis

HF Hsieh et al.

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH (2005)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.