4.7 Article

Evaluating denoising strategies in resting-state functional magnetic resonance in traumatic brain injury (EpiBioS4Rx)

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 43, Issue 15, Pages 4640-4649

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25979

Keywords

artifact; head motion; motion correction; nuisance regression; physiological noise; TBI

Funding

  1. Foundation for the National Institutes of Health [1K99NS104243-01, U54 NS100064]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [2013/07559-3, 2020/00019-7]
  3. Interuniversity Cluster Project University of Vienna -FWF Austrian Science Fund Connecting Minds [CMW 30-B]
  4. Tiny Blue Dot Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the ability of different preprocessing strategies to mitigate noise-related signal in functional connectivity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. The pipelines combining spike regression with physiological regressors were found to be the most effective. It was also observed that excluding high-motion participants reduced the importance of the choice of denoising pipeline but resulted in substantial data loss.
Resting-state functional MRI is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is now included in some diagnostic guidelines for severe brain injury patients. However, to ensure high-quality data, one should mitigate fMRI-related noise typical of this population. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ability of different preprocessing strategies to mitigate noise-related signal (i.e., in-scanner movement and physiological noise) in functional connectivity (FC) of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. We applied nine commonly used denoising strategies, combined into 17 pipelines, to 88 TBI patients from the Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Anti-epileptogenic Therapy clinical trial. Pipelines were evaluated by three quality control (QC) metrics across three exclusion regimes based on the participant's head movement profile. While no pipeline eliminated noise effects on FC, some pipelines exhibited relatively high effectiveness depending on the exclusion regime. Once high-motion participants were excluded, the choice of denoising pipeline becomes secondary - although this strategy leads to substantial data loss. Pipelines combining spike regression with physiological regressors were the best performers, whereas pipelines that used automated data-driven methods performed comparatively worse. In this study, we report the first large-scale evaluation of denoising pipelines aimed at reducing noise-related FC in a clinical population known to be highly susceptible to in-scanner motion and significant anatomical abnormalities. If resting-state functional magnetic resonance is to be a successful clinical technique, it is crucial that procedures mitigating the effect of noise be systematically evaluated in the most challenging populations, such as TBI datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available