Journal
HIV MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 191-201Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hiv.13367
Keywords
HIV prevention; HIV testing; missed opportunities for uptake; new HIV diagnosis; PrEP; PrEP
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aimed to investigate missed opportunities for the use of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in people recently diagnosed with HIV, factors associated with PrEP knowledge, and reasons for not using PrEP. The results showed that there were gaps in the provision of PrEP information by healthcare providers and low acceptability of PrEP among eligible patients. Therefore, it is necessary to involve more diverse healthcare providers in prescribing PrEP and raise awareness among at-risk populations about the risk of HIV infection.
Objectives Our objective was to identify missed opportunities for the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in people with recently acquired HIV, factors associated with PrEP knowledge, and reasons for not using PrEP. Design This was a French national cross-sectional multicentre study enrolling people diagnosed with recent HIV (incomplete Western blot or negative HIV test in the previous 6 months) in 28 HIV clinical centres. Data were gathered using a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ). Method We analysed missed opportunities for PrEP use via a retrospective prep cascade. Factors associated with prior knowledge of PrEP and reasons for PrEP non-use among those who knew about PrEP were described using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results Of the 224 eligible patients, 185 completed the SAQ and 168 (91%) were eligible for PrEP. Of these, 90% reported seeing at least one physician during the previous year, 26% received information about PrEP, and 5% used PrEP. Factors independently associated with a higher probability of knowing about PrEP were being a man who has sex with men, being aged 25-30 years (vs older), undergoing HIV screening at least once every semester (vs less often; odds ratio [OR] 4.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.00-8.45), and practicing chemsex (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.12-9.10). Fear of side effects and a low perceived risk of HIV infection were the two most common reasons for not using PrEP (N = 40 [33.33%] and N = 34 [28.3%], respectively). Conclusions We found two gaps in the retrospective PrEP cascade: insufficient provision of PrEP information by healthcare providers (mainly general practitioners) and low PrEP acceptability by informed, eligible patients. More diverse healthcare providers need to be involved in PrEP prescription, and at-risk people need to be sensitized to the risk of HIV infection.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available