4.4 Article

Lack of efficacy of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients with concomitant hematological malignancies: An Italian retrospective study

Journal

HEMATOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 857-863

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hon.3060

Keywords

convalescent plasma; COVID-19; disease severity; hematological malignancy; survival data

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study assessed the clinical outcome of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies treated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma or standard of care therapy. The results indicated a lack of efficacy of convalescent plasma in this high-risk patient cohort, consistent with previous randomized studies in immunocompetent individuals with COVID-19.
A multicenter retrospective study was designed to assess clinical outcome of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) following treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma (CP) or standard of care therapy. To this aim, a propensity score matching was used to assess the role of non-randomized administration of CP in this high-risk cohort of patients from the Italian Hematology Alliance on COVID-19 (ITA-HEMA-COV) project, now including 2049 untreated control patients. We investigated 30- and 90-day mortality, rate of admission to intensive care unit, proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support, hospitalization time, and SARS-CoV-2 clearance in 79 CP recipients and compared results with 158 propensity score-matched controls. Results indicated a lack of efficacy of CP in the study group compared with the untreated group, thus confirming the negative results obtained from randomized studies in immunocompetent individuals with COVID-19. In conclusion, this retrospective analysis did not meet the primary and secondary end points in any category of immunocompromized patients affected by HM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available