4.3 Review

Revised Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association for Acute Pancreatitis

Journal

GUT AND LIVER
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDITORIAL OFFICE GUT & LIVER
DOI: 10.5009/gnl220108

Keywords

Acute pancreatitis; Management; Guideline; Evidence-based medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute pancreatitis can vary in severity and have life-threatening complications. In order to improve the management of acute pancreatitis and contribute to healthcare improvements, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association developed guidelines in 2013. However, challenging issues and new evidence have led to an extensive revision of the guidelines.
Acute pancreatitis can range from a mild, self-limiting disease requiring no more than supportive care, to severe disease with life-threatening complications. With the goal of providing a recommendation framework for clinicians to manage acute pancreatitis, and to contribute to improvements in national health care, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association (KPBA) established the Korean guidelines for acute pancreatitis management in 2013. However, many challenging issues exist which often lead to differences in clinical practices. In addition, with newly obtained evidence regarding acute pancreatitis, there have been great changes in recent knowledge and information regarding this disorder. Therefore, the KPBA committee underwent an extensive revision of the guidelines. The revised guidelines were developed using the Delphi method, and the main topics of the guidelines include the following: diagnosis, severity assessment, initial treatment, nutritional support, convalescent treatment, and the treatment of local complications and necrotizing pancreatitis. Specific recommendations are presented, along with the evidence levels and recommendation grades. (Gut Liver, Published online August 17, 2022)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available