4.7 Article

Deep learning for magnitude prediction in earthquake early warning

Journal

GONDWANA RESEARCH
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages 164-173

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2022.06.009

Keywords

Magnitude; Deep learning; Earthquake early warning; P-wave; Ground motion records

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a new approach, EEWNet, based on deep learning to predict the magnitude in earthquake early warning systems. By using the initial P-wave recorded by a single station as input without any preprocessing, EEWNet can accurately predict the magnitude. Compared to traditional methods, EEWNet can provide faster magnitude estimates when the P-wave arrives.
Fast and accurate magnitude prediction is the key to the success of earthquake early warning (EEW). However, it is difficult to significantly improve the performance of magnitude prediction by empirically defined characteristic parameters. In this study, we have proposed a new approach (EEWNet) based on deep learning to predict magnitude for EEW. The initial few seconds of P-wave recorded by a single station without any preprocessing is used as the input to EEWNet, and the maximum displacement for the whole record is predicted and by which the magnitude is calculated. A large number of borehole underground strong motion records are used to train, validate and test the proposed EEWNet, and the predicted results are compared against those by empirical peak displacement Pd method. The comparison demonstrates that EEWNet produces better and quicker results than those by Pd, and EEWNet can predict magnitude between 4.0 and 5.9 as early as the first 0.5 s P-wave arrives. EEWNet is therefore expected to significantly enhance the accuracy and speed of magnitude estimation in practical regional EEW systems. (c) 2022 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available