4.8 Article

Contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold-adapted species

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 21, Pages 6228-6238

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16352

Keywords

climate change; climate scenarios; population dynamics; population projections; snow cover; snowshoe hare; state-space model; temperature

Funding

  1. Division of Environmental Biology [0841884]
  2. Division of Graduate Education [DGE--1252376]
  3. National Science Foundation [1736249]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [0841884] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Office of Integrative Activities
  7. Office Of The Director [1736249] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ecological processes are influenced by abiotic factors, such as temperature and snow. This study found that reduced fall and spring snow duration and warmer summers led to decreased snowshoe hare density, while warmer winters increased hare density.
Many ecological processes are profoundly influenced by abiotic factors, such as temperature and snow. However, despite strong evidence linking shifts in these ecological processes to corresponding shifts in abiotic factors driven by climate change, the mechanisms connecting population size to season-specific climate drivers are little understood. Using a 21-year dataset and a Bayesian state space model, we identified biologically informed seasonal climate covariates that influenced densities of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), a cold-adapted boreal herbivore. We found that snow and temperature had strong but conflicting season-dependent effects. Reduced snow duration in spring and fall and warmer summers were associated with lowered hare density, whereas warmer winters were associated with increased density. When modeled simultaneously and under two climate change scenarios, the negative effects of reduced fall and spring snow duration and warmer summers overwhelm the positive effect of warmer winters, producing projected population declines. Ultimately, the contrasting population-level impacts of climate change across seasons emphasize the critical need to examine the entire annual climate cycle to understand potential long-term population consequences of climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available