4.7 Article

Carbonation of Serpentinite in Creeping Faults of California

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL099185

Keywords

mineral carbonation; serpentinite; talc; CO2; aseismic creep; San Andreas Fault

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [NSF-EAR-1220280, NSF-EAR-1219908, NSF-OCE-2001728]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the relationships between serpentinite, silica-carbonate rock, and CO2-rich aqueous fluids in creeping faults of California. The carbonation of serpentinite is found to play a crucial role in aseismic creep, leading to the formation of talc and magnesite. These findings have significant implications for understanding the mechanisms behind earthquake generation in the California region.
Several large strike slip faults in central and northern California accommodate plate motions through aseismic creep. Although there is no consensus regarding the underlying cause of aseismic creep, aqueous fluids and mechanically weak, velocity-strengthening minerals appear to play a central role. This study integrates field observations and thermodynamic modeling to examine possible relationships between the occurrence of serpentinite, silica-carbonate rock, and CO2-rich aqueous fluids in creeping faults of California. Our models predict that carbonation of serpentinite leads to the formation of talc and magnesite, followed by silica-carbonate rock. While abundant exposures of silica-carbonate rock indicate complete carbonation, serpentinite-hosted CO2-rich spring fluids are strongly supersaturated with talc at elevated temperatures. Hence, carbonation of serpentinite is likely ongoing in parts of the San Andres Fault system and operates in conjunction with other modes of talc formation that may further enhance the potential for aseismic creep, thereby limiting the potential for large earthquakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available