4.7 Article

Epigenomics of rats' liver and its cross-species functional annotation reveals key regulatory genes underlying short term heat-stress response

Journal

GENOMICS
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110449

Keywords

ATAC-seq; DNA methylation; RNA-sequencing; Multi-omics analysis; Transcription factor; Genetic marker

Funding

  1. fund of Modern Agroindustry Technology Research System of China [CARS-36]
  2. program for Changjiang Scholar and Innovation Research Team in University of China [IRT_15R62]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals the epigenetic and transcriptional alterations induced by heat stress in the liver of rats, and identifies potential heat stress response markers. The integration of ATAC-seq, RNA-Seq, and WGBS data provides comprehensive insights into the molecular responses to heat stress in mammals.
Molecular responses to heat stress are multifaceted and under a complex cellular post-transcriptional control. This study explores the epigenetic and transcriptional alterations induced by heat stress (42 degrees C for 120 min) in the liver of rats, by integrating ATAC-seq, RNA-Seq, and WGBS information. Out of 2586 differential ATAC-seq peaks induced by heat stress, 36 up-regulated and 22 down-regulated transcript factors (TFs) are predicted, such as Cebp alpha, Foxa2, Foxo4, Nfya and Sp3. Furthermore, 150,189 differentially methylated regions represent 2571 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). By integrating all data, 45 DEGs are concluded as potential heat stress response markers in rats. To comprehensively annotate and narrow down predicted markers, they are integrated with GWAS results of heat stress parameters in cows, and PheWAS data in humans. Besides better understanding of heat stress responses in mammals, INSR, MAPK8, RHPN2 and BTBD7 are proposed as candidate markers for heat stress in mammals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available