4.5 Article

Validity and reproducibility of C-Mill walking-adaptability assessment in polio survivors

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 314-321

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.06.008

Keywords

Polio survivors; Walking adaptability; Fall-risk assessment; Validity; Reproducibility

Funding

  1. Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrated the validity and reproducibility of the C-Mill walking-adaptability assessment in polio survivors. Adding walking-adaptability assessment, particularly the more challenging tests, to currently used clinical tests could improve fall-risk evaluation in this population.
Background: The C-Mill interactive treadmill allows for a safe walking-adaptability assessment, unveiling reduced walking adaptability in polio survivors compared to healthy individuals, possibly related to their high fall rate. However, evidence on its validity and reproducibility is scarce. Research question: What is the validity and reproducibility of C-Mill walking-adaptability assessment in polio survivors? Methods: Polio survivors with a history and/or fear of falling (n = 46) performed two walking-adaptability assessments, 1-2 weeks apart, including target-stepping tests (with 0%, 20% and 30% inter-target variance) and obstacle-avoidance tests (anticipatory and reactive). We examined (1) face validity by determining Group effects (for subgroups stratified for fall frequency, fear of falling and leg muscle weakness) and Condition effects (for difficulty level) on walking-adaptability outcomes, (2) construct validity by correlating walking-adaptability and balance outcomes, and (3) content validity by establishing possible ceiling effects. We determined whether face validity findings were reproducible over test occasions and calculated Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and the 95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) for walking-adaptability outcomes. Results: Walking-adaptability outcomes differed in to-be-expected directions for subgroups stratified for fall frequency and leg muscle weakness and for difficulty levels, all reproducible over test occasions. Correlations between walking-adaptability and balance outcomes were mainly low (r < 0.587). Ceiling effects were present for anticipatory obstacle-avoidance and balance outcomes, but not for reactive obstacle avoidance. ICCs [95% confidence intervals] were good for the challenging 20% (0.80[0.67-0.88]) and 30% target-stepping conditions (0.74[0.57-0.85]) and for the reactive obstacle-avoidance (0.76[0.59-0.86]) condition, but not for 0% target stepping and anticipatory obstacle-avoidance (ICC < 0.62) conditions. Likewise, the narrowest LoA were observed for the 20% and 30% target-stepping conditions. Significance: We proved face, construct and content validity of C-Mill walking-adaptability assessment in polio survivors with a history of falls and/or fear of falling. Adding walking-adaptability assessment, particularly the more challenging tests given their superior reproducibility, to currently used clinical tests could improve fall-risk evaluation in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available