4.7 Article

A knock study of hydrogen-fueled Wankel rotary engine

Journal

FUEL
Volume 321, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124121

Keywords

Hydrogen; Wankel rotary engine; Knock

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [51976003]
  2. Beijing Lab of New Energy Vehicles [JF005015201901, JF005015201801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to investigate the knock of HWRE from different aspects and provide relevant information for the design of hydrogen specific WRE. The results show that factors such as ignition timing, spark plug number, spark plug location, excess air ratio, and engine speed have an impact on the knock intensity and duration of HWER.
Hydrogen-fueled Wankel rotary engine (HWER) is an excellent power device with superior power and emission performances. Besides, unlike hydrogen-fueled reciprocating piston engines, HWRE is less prone to backfire due to its structural advantages. However, limited by its long combustion chamber, knock, one of abnormal combustion in engines, still hinders the development of HWER. Hence, based on this consideration, the goal of this work is to investigate the knock of HWRE from different aspects, including ignition timing, spark plug number, spark plug location, excess air ratio and engine speed, to provide relevant information for the design of hydrogen specific WRE. The results show that the knock intensity gradually increases as the ignition timing is advanced, the excess air ratio is decreased and the engine speed is increased, but the knock duration shows different variations. Adopting dual spark plugs tends to lead to stronger knock caused by unstable combustion of hydrogen, while only adopting leading spark plug tends to lead to the knock caused by auto-ignition. When dual spark plugs are used, the leading spark plug is more responsible for the knock caused by unstable combustion and the trailing spark plug is more responsible for the knock caused by auto-ignition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available