4.7 Article

Reaction network and molecular distribution of sulfides in gasoline and diesel of FCC process

Journal

FUEL
Volume 319, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123567

Keywords

Fluid catalytic cracking; Structure oriented lumping; Molecular-level model; Gasoline; Diesel; Sulfide

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61973124, U1862204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A molecular-level model based on the Structure Oriented Lumping (SOL) method was established to guide the accurate control of sulfides in gasoline and diesel of the Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) process. By tracking their generation paths and reaction paths in a complex reaction network, the conversion law of sulfides in gasoline and diesel was investigated. The quantitative effects of operation conditions on sulfide content in gasoline and diesel were also calculated.
In order to guide the accurate control of the sulfides in gasoline and diesel of Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) process, a molecular-level model was established based on the Structure Oriented Lumping (SOL) method. According to the molecular composition characteristics of FCC feed oil, a molecular composition matrix containing 4,148 structural vectors was constructed with 24 structural increments. Using MATLAB software, the SOL reaction rules were compiled and a complex reaction network containing of about 110,000 reactions was established. According to the classification rules, the sulfides in gasoline and diesel represented by 32 and 136 structural vectors were divided into mercaptans, thioethers, monocyclic thiophenes, benzothiophenes and dibenzothiophenes, respectively. The conversion law of sulfides in gasoline and diesel was investigated by tracking their generation paths and reaction paths in the reaction network. The effects of the operation conditions on the sulfide content in gasoline and diesel were calculated quantitatively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available