4.5 Article

How to orchestrate a soccer team: Generalized synchronization promoted by rhythmic acoustic stimuli

Journal

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.909939

Keywords

interpersonal coordination; entrainment; dynamic attention theory; tempo preference; rhythmic acoustic stimuli and cognition; generalized synchronization

Funding

  1. CONACyT, Mexico
  2. [CF-263377]
  3. [CF-610285]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that an appropriate acoustic environment can improve the interaction between soccer teammates, leading to increased connectivity and scoring rate in male teams. Surprisingly, female teams did not show any improvement under the same conditions. The study also revealed that the acoustic rhythm can modulate participants' attention level, with distinct tempo preferences and gender differences.
Interpersonal coordination requires precise actions concerted in space and time in a self-organized manner. We found, using soccer teams as a testing ground, that a common timeframe provided by adequate acoustic stimuli improves the interplay between teammates. We provide quantitative evidence that the connectivity between teammates and the scoring rate of male soccer teams improve significantly when playing under the influence of an appropriate acoustic environment. Unexpectedly, female teams do not show any improvement under the same experimental conditions. We show by follow-up experiments that the acoustic rhythm modulates the attention level of the participants with a pronounced tempo preference and a marked gender difference in the preferred tempo. These results lead to a consistent explanation in terms of the dynamical system theory, nonlinear resonances, and dynamic attention theory, which may illuminate generic mechanisms of the brain dynamics and may have an impact on the design of novel training strategies in team sports.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available