4.6 Article

Carbon dioxide limitation of benthic primary production in a boreal lake

Journal

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 10, Pages 1752-1760

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13972

Keywords

benthic microalgal gross primary production; CO2 limitation; dissolved organic carbon; lakes; light limitation

Funding

  1. Swedish research council Formas [2016-00486]
  2. Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse [2016.0083]
  3. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Iraq [18603]
  4. Vinnova [2016-00486] Funding Source: Vinnova
  5. Formas [2016-00486] Funding Source: Formas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that benthic microalgal GPP can be CO2-limited when light is not limiting, and both dissolved inorganic carbon and DOC additions can stimulate benthic GPP.
Gross primary production (GPP) by benthic microalgae growing on soft sediments is an important contributor to lake productivity in many lakes world-wide. As benthic microalgae have access to nutrients in the sediment they have been regarded as primarily controlled by light, while the role of CO2 as a limiting factor for benthic GPP in lake ecosystems is largely unknown. In this study, we experimentally tested for CO2 limitation of benthic GPP by collecting littoral surface sediments, with associated benthic microalgae, from a typical boreal lake. Intact sediment cores were incubated at different depths (light conditions) after addition of dissolved inorganic (bicarbonate) or organic (DOC; glucose) carbon as direct and indirect sources of CO2, respectively. Benthic microalgal GPP was stimulated by both dissolved inorganic carbon and DOC additions at high, but not at low, light levels. This study shows that benthic microalgal GPP can be CO2-limited when light is not limiting and suggests that both direct (e.g., via groundwater inflow) and indirect (via mineralisation of DOC) CO2 supply can stimulate benthic GPP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available