4.7 Article

Bioaccessibility and bioactivities of phenolic compounds from roasted coffee beans during in vitro digestion and colonic fermentation

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 386, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132794

Keywords

Coffee beans; Roasting; Phenolic compounds; In vitro digestion; Colonic fermentation; Bioaccessibility

Funding

  1. HPLC
  2. Master/PhD students of Dr Hafiz Suleria from the School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, the University of Melbourne

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bioaccessibility and bioactivity of phenolic compounds in coffee beans are influenced by the roasting and digestion processes. Light roasted coffee beans exhibit higher phenolic bioaccessibility, antioxidant activity, and short chain fatty acid production, which are more beneficial for gut health.
Bioaccessibility and bioactivity of phenolic compounds in coffee beans relate to roasting and digestion process. This study aimed to estimate phenolic content, antioxidant potential, bioaccessibility, and changes in short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production during in vitro digestion and colonic fermentation of commercial roasted (light, medium and dark) coffee beans. There was no significant difference found among all three different roasting levels. TPC and DPPH were enhanced 15 mg GAE/g and 60 mg TE/g during gastrointestinal digestion, respectively. For colonic fermentation, the highest TPC and FRAP of all coffee beans was found at 2 and 4 h, respectively. The gastric bioaccessibility of most of the phenolic compounds were relatively higher due to thermal phenolic degradation. Total SCFAs production was only up to 0.02 mM because of thermal polysaccharide decomposition. Light roasted beans exhibited relatively higher phenolic bioaccessibility, antioxidant activities and SCFAs production, which would be more beneficial to gut health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available