4.7 Article

Construction of a magnetic solid-phase extraction method for the analysis of azole pesticides residue in medicinal plants

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 386, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132743

Keywords

Magnetic solid-phase extraction; Azole pesticides residue; Medicinal plants; Cyclodextrin; Tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFD020030803, 2019YFD1002103]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China [2020CFB528]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21507032]
  4. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-31-31]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive and cost-effective method for the quantitative analysis of azole pesticides residues in six medicinal plants was established using magnetic cyclodextrin crosslinked with tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile (Fe3O4@TFN-CDPs) coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). This method provides a new idea for the analysis of trace pesticides in complicated matrices.
In this work, a sensitive and cost-effective method for the quantitative analysis of azole pesticides residues in six medicinal plants was established based on magnetic cyclodextrin crosslinked with tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile (Fe3O4@TFN-CDPs) coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Through characterization analysis, the outer shell of Fe3O4@TFN-CDPs has observed coating with a network of the polymer and forming a core-shell structure. Under the optimum conditions, the limits of detection (LODs) and limits of qualification (LOQs) of target pesticides were ranged from 0.011 to 0.106 mu g Kg(-1) and from 0.036 to 0.354 mu g Kg(-1), respectively. Finally, the achieved recoveries of pesticides in six medicinal samples fluctuated from 60.1% to 102.3%. Altogether, this method based on Fe3O4@TFN-CDPs composites provided a new idea for the analysis of trace pesticides in complicated matrices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available