4.7 Article

Turbo-Treatment of Rice Flour to Improve Technological Functionality

Journal

FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 2344-2353

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-022-02882-5

Keywords

Damaged starch; Design of experiment; Starch gelatinization; Pasting profile; Thermal treatment; Viscosity

Funding

  1. Universita degli Studi di Milano within the CRUI-CARE Agreement
  2. Lombardy Region (Linea R&S per Aggregazioni) [145075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the potential of turbo-technology in modifying the technological properties of rice flour. The results showed that the addition of water significantly affected the characteristics of the treated flour. The study provides a guide for designing flour with tailored technological properties using turbo-technology.
Turbo-technology (i.e., a heat/shear treatment) potential in modifying rice flour technological properties (i.e., damaged starch, pasting properties, apparent cold viscosities, and color) depending on cooking temperature (120-200 degrees C), added water (30-40%), and drying temperature (160-200 degrees C) was evaluated. Applying a Box-Behnken design, highly significant (p < 0.001) models were found for moisture, damaged starch, pasting properties, and cold viscosities. The most important factor was the added water, significantly (p < 0.001) affecting all treated flour characteristics. The optimization resulted in 200 degrees C as cooking and drying temperature and 40% added water, but values of damaged starch and cold viscosities in the treated flour were still low. Thus, flour was overnight wetted (40% water) before cooking and drying at 200 degrees C, obtaining high values of damaged starch (49.5 +/- 1.5 g/100 g db) and cold viscosities (from 6213 to 21,436 cP). The study represents a guide for the application of turbo-technology to design flour with tailored technological properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available