4.2 Article

Evaluation of smoke gas toxicity and smoke density of bus interior materials

Journal

FIRE AND MATERIALS
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 270-281

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fam.3095

Keywords

bus; fire; interior materials; regulation 118; smoke chamber; smoke density; smoke toxicity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Materials used for interior parts in buses are evaluated for fire properties and smoke production. While the materials met the requirements for fire classification, they produced dark smoke and melting burning pieces. The high smoke production would reduce visibility and hinder safe evacuation of passengers in case of a fire. Additionally, toxic gases were detected in the smoke.
Materials used for interior parts in buses are today fire classified according to UNECE Regulation 118, evaluating the horizontal and vertical burning rates and the melting behaviour. However, in recent accidents, the smoke has been identified as the critical parameter for deaths. An evaluation has been made of six materials used as interior parts in busses and is presented in this paper. Fire testing was conducted according to UNECE R 118 and smoke production including smoke gas toxicity was further evaluated with the smoke chamber test, EN ISO 5659-2 and EN 17084. All six tested materials fulfilled the requirements of UNECE R 118; however, most materials showed fire properties which are not desirable, such as dark smoke and melting of large burning pieces. The tests with the smoke chamber showed that all materials gave a very high smoke production, in fact a smoke density value of the highest possible for the equipment to measure. This occurred only after a few minutes of test time. Thus, it can be concluded that this high smoke production will, in case of fire in a bus, reduce the visibility, and limit the ability of the passengers to safely evacuate. In addition, several toxic gases were detected in the smoke, both irritants and suffocating gases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available