4.7 Article

Pregnancy outcomes after frozen-thawed embryo transfer using letrozole ovulation induction, natural, or programmed cycles

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages 690-698

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.06.013

Keywords

Frozen embryo transfer; letrozole FET; endometrial preparation; natural cycle FET; in vitro fertilization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective cohort study compared the pregnancy outcomes of letrozole ovulation induction, natural cycles, and programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. The results showed that the ongoing pregnancy rate/live birth rate was higher in letrozole FETs than in programmed FETs, but comparable to natural FETs. The ongoing pregnancy rate/live birth rate was comparable between natural and programmed FETs. The clinical loss rate was lower in the natural FET group than in the programmed FET group.
Objective: To evaluate and compare pregnancy outcomes between letrozole ovulation induction, natural, and programmed frozen -thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in a population based in the United States.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Setting: Single university-affiliated infertility practice.Patient(s): A total of 3,148 FET cycles consisting of patients aged %45 years transferring blastocysts that were created from autolo-gous oocytes between January 2015 and July 2021.Intervention(s): None.Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) or live birth rate (LBR). The secondary out-comes included clinical pregnancy and clinical loss rates (CLRs). Result(s): The OPR/LBR was higher among letrozole FETs than among programmed FETs (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.11, 95% confi- dence interval [CI] 1.02-1.21) but comparable to natural FETs (aRR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96-1.14). The OPR/LBR was comparable between natural and programmed FETs (aRR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.13). The CLR was lower in the natural FET group than in the programmed FET group (aRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.84). There were no differences in CLRs between letrozole and programmed FETs and between le-trozole and natural FETs. Among ovulatory women, the OPR/LBR among letrozole FETs was higher than that among programmed FETs (aRR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28). The CLR among ovulatory women was significantly lower in both letrozole FETs (aRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22- 0.87) and natural FETs (aRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.80) than in programmed FETs. Among anovulatory women, the OPR/LBR in the le-trozole FET group was similar to that in the programmed FET group (aRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.79-1.13).Conclusion(s): Letrozole and natural FET clinical outcomes were improved compared with programmed FET outcomes. (Fertil Sterile 2022;118:690-8. (c) 2022 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)El resumen esta disponible en Espanol al final del articulo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available