4.5 Article

Assessment of mechanical and fatigue crack growth properties of wire plus arc additively manufactured mild steel components

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.13797

Keywords

additive manufacturing; fatigue crack growth; fracture mechanics; mechanical properties; steel

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/S000747/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study was conducted to evaluate the mechanical and fatigue crack propagation properties of wire + arc additively manufactured ER70S-6 components. The hardness values were slightly higher at the bottom and top of the wall. There was a marginal difference in mechanical properties between orientations. The crack growth rates of both deposition strategies were found to be very similar, and the NASGRO crack growth equation can capture the variability in crack growth histories reasonably well.
A study has been conducted to evaluate the mechanical and fatigue crack propagation properties of wire + arc additively manufactured ER70S-6 components. A parallel-built deposition strategy was employed to fabricate the additively manufactured wall. The hardness values were slightly higher at the bottom and top of the wall due to the presence of Widmanstatten ferrite and carbides. The characterization of mechanical properties in both orientations; parallel and perpendicular to the deposition direction showed a marginal difference in yield strength and ultimate tensile strength. The crack growth rates were correlated with linear elastic fracture mechanics parameter Delta K and compared with an oscillation-built deposition strategy from the literature. The crack growth rates of both deposition strategies were found to be very similar to each other. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the variability in the crack growth histories can be reasonably well captured by using the NASGRO crack growth equation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available