4.7 Article

Automatic labeling of river restoration project documents based on project objectives and restoration methods

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116754

Keywords

River restoration; Project document; Object labeling; Method labeling; Multilabel text classification

Funding

  1. Research Grant Council (RGC) of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government [E-PolyU502/16]
  2. European Commission (EC)'s Horizon 2020 Research Scheme, Hong Kong RGC
  3. Xidian University [XJS212207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses machine-learning methods to classify river restoration projects, developing a deep neural network and a dictionary-based multilabel classification method to label project objectives and methods. The results indicate that these automatic labeling methods perform well, providing convenient reference and understanding of the relationships between project objectives and methods for project planners.
River restoration projects are widely implemented around the world. Such projects are usually complicated endeavors. Engineering, environmental, and social impacts must be considered under various constraints. Gaining lessons from existing projects would be valuable in new project planning. However, because such projects vary greatly in objectives and used methods, it is difficult to pinpoint relevant projects for reference, even if a large number of cases are collected in a decision-support system. In this study, machine-learning-based approaches were used to classify the description documents for river restoration projects. Based on the characteristics of such projects, a deep neural network (DNN) was developed to label project objectives, and a dictionary-based multilabel classification (MLC) method was developed to label project methods. The resulting labels were validated using 1400 project description documents. In labeling project objectives, the method resulted in a weighted average f1-score of 0.82 and 0.55 for the training and testing dataset, respectively. In labeling project methods, the f1-score was found to be 0.70. Both results indicate that the developed automatic labeling methods perform satisfactorily. The labels attached to the project documents enable project planners to conveniently find the relevant documents for reference and understand the relationships among the objectives and methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available