4.5 Review

Pro-, pre- and synbiotics for the prevention of incidental ventilator-associated pneumonia among critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 1205-1215

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2089652

Keywords

Intensive care unit; mechanical ventilation; mortality; prebiotics; probiotic; synbiotic; ventilator-associated pneumonia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study suggests that pro-, pre- and synbiotics can prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit for critically ill patients.
Objectives This study investigated the preventive effects of pro-, pre- and synbiotics on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) among critically ill patients. Methods The PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant articles written before 19 February 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical efficacy of pro-, pre- and synbiotics with placebos or standard treatments for the prevention of incidental VAP were included. Results A total of 15 RCTs were included. Patients receiving pro-, pre- and synbiotics had a lower risk than the control group of contracting VAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.85; I-2 = 67%). The duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter in the study group than in the control group (mean difference [MD], -1.61 days; 95% CI, -2.72 to -0.50; I-2 = 86%), and the study group had a shorter duration of stay in the intensive care unit than the control group did (MD, -1.72 days; 95% CI, -3.22 to -0.23; I-2 = 87%). Conclusions Pro-, pre- and synbiotics can prevent VAP and the use of probiotics for patients who are critically ill should be supported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available