4.3 Article

Safety and tolerability of spesolimab in patients with ulcerative colitis

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 141-152

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2103536

Keywords

Safety; spesolimab; tolerability; ulcerative colitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reported the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy data of intravenous Spesolimab in ulcerative colitis. Spesolimab was well tolerated without unexpected safety concerns, and the safety data were consistent with studies in other inflammatory diseases.
Background Interleukin (IL)-36 signaling has been shown to be increased in ulcerative colitis (UC). Spesolimab, a novel humanized monoclonal antibody, targets the IL-36 pathway. Research Design and Methods We report safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy data of intravenous (IV) spesolimab in UC. Study 1: phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (300 mg single dose; 450 mg every 4 weeks [q4w]; or 1,200 mg q4w, three doses). Study 2: phase IIa, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (1,200 mg q4w). Study 3: phase IIa, open-label, single-arm trial (1,200 mg q4w). Studies lasted 12 weeks, with a 12-, 24-, and 16-week safety follow-up, respectively. Results Adverse event (AE) rates were similar for spesolimab and placebo in Studies 1 (N = 98; 64.9%; 65.2%) and 2 (N = 22; 86.7%; 71.4%); all patients in Study 3 (N = 8) experienced AEs. The most frequent investigator-assessed drug-related (spesolimab; placebo) AEs were skin rash (5.4%; 0%) and nasopharyngitis (4.1%; 0%) in Study 1; acne (13.3%; 0%) in Study 2; one patient reported skin rash, nasopharyngitis, headache, and acne in Study 3. Efficacy endpoints were not met. Conclusions Spesolimab was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns. The safety data are consistent with studies in other inflammatory diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available