4.7 Article

Effects of a new compatibilizer on the mechanical properties of TPU/PEBA blends

Journal

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111358

Keywords

Blending modification; Compatibilizer; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21174063]
  2. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [2018ZF52068]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) were improved by modifying it with polyether-block-amide elastomer (PEBA) through blending. The addition of a compatible agent, E-PU-I, improved the compatibility between TPU and PEBA, leading to more uniform dispersion and smaller particle size, thereby enhancing the overall performance of the blends. The mechanical properties of the blends were significantly improved when the critical E-PU-I content was around 3.2 parts.
In this work, to improve the mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), polyether-block-amide elastomer (PEBA) was used to modify it through a blending method. Due to the low compatibility of the two, a polyurethane with one end blocked with an isocyanate group and one end blocked with two epoxy groups was prepared as a compatibilizer, named as E-PU-I. And a series of TPU/PEBA blends with different components were prepared using a torque rheometer, and the effects of E-PU-I on the microstructure, phase interface interaction, rheological properties and mechanical properties of the blends were investigated. It proves that E-PU-I improves the compatibility between TPU and PEBA, resulting in more uniform dispersion of PEBA in TPU and smaller particle size, thus improving the overall performance of the blends. In addition, when the critical E-PU-I content is around 3.2 parts, the mechanical properties of the blends have been significantly improved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available