4.4 Article

Effect of individual characteristics and aerobic training on the %HRR-%V?O2R relationship

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 1600-1611

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2113441

Keywords

Exercise; intensity; heart rate; oxygen uptake; aerobic training

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess if considering individual characteristics can make the relationship between heart rate and oxygen uptake reserve during incremental exercise more accurate. The study found that regardless of individual characteristics, the relationship between the percentage of heart rate reserve and oxygen uptake reserve differed from the identity line, and the difference increased after aerobic training.
This study aimed to assess if, during incremental exercise, considering individual characteristics can make the relationship between the percentages of heart rate (HRR) and oxygen uptake (V?O2R) reserve either 1:1 or more accurate. Cycle ergometer data of the maximal incremental exercise tests performed by 450 healthy and sedentary participants (17-66 years) of the HERITAGE Family Study, grouped for sex, ethnicity, age, body fat, resting HR, and V?O-2max, were used to calculate the individual linear regressions between %HRR and %V?O2R. The mean slope and intercept of the individual linear regressions of each subgroup were compared with 1 and 0 (identity line), respectively, using Hotelling tests followed by post-hoc one-sample t-tests. Two multiple linear regressions were also performed, using either the slopes or intercepts of the individual linear regressions as dependent variables and sex, age, resting HR, and V?O-2max as independent variables. The mean %HRR-%V?O2R relationships of all subgroups differed from the identity line. Moreover, individual linear regression intercepts (8.9 +/- 16.0) and slopes (0.971 +/- 0.190) changed (p < 0.001) after 20 weeks of aerobic training (13.1 +/- 11.1 and 0.891 +/- 0.122). The multiple linear regressions could explain only 3.8% and 1.3% of the variance in the intercepts and slopes, whose variability remained high (standard error of estimate of 15.8 and 0.189). In conclusion, the %HRR-%V?O2R relationship differs from the identity line regardless of individual characteristics and their difference increased after aerobic training. Moreover, due to the high interindividual variability, using a single equation for the whole population seems not suitable for representing the %HRR-%V?O2R relationship of a given subject, even when several individual characteristics are considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available